UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 11, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 11, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

Daily UPSC Mains Answer Writing: Question & Model Answer Framework (October 11, 2026)

Today's Mains Question (GS Paper 3 - 15 Marks / 250 Words)

"The emergence of 'on-orbit space control weapons' marks a shift from strategic ambiguity to the active militarization of outer space. Critically analyze the adequacy of existing international legal frameworks in addressing this challenge, and propose a roadmap to ensure outer space remains a sustainable global common."

1. Decoding the Directive & Demand of the Question

Directive: "Critically Analyze" requires you to examine the current status of space weaponization, identify the loopholes in international law, and provide a balanced judgment on why existing treaties are insufficient, followed by constructive solutions.

Demand:
1. Context: Explain the threat posed by on-orbit space control weapons (dual-use tech).
2. Legal Critique: Analyze why the Outer Space Treaty (1967) and other frameworks are failing to prevent this.
3. Way Forward: Suggest pragmatic, multilateral solutions to ensure space sustainability.

2. Structural Outline / Skeleton Framework

  • Introduction (30-40 words): Define 'on-orbit space control weapons' (dual-use satellites/co-orbital ASATs). Reference the Outer Space Treaty (OST) 1967 as the current, albeit aging, foundation.
  • Body Section 1: The Threat Landscape (80-90 words): Discuss the shift from strategic ambiguity to active threats. Mention the Kessler Syndrome (chain reaction of debris) and the risk to critical satellite infrastructure (GPS, communication, surveillance).
  • Body Section 2: Critical Analysis of Legal Frameworks (80-90 words): Highlight the limitations of the 1967 OST (prohibits WMDs but silent on conventional/dual-use weapons). Discuss the geopolitical deadlock in the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UNCOPUOS).
  • Way Forward & Recommendation (40-50 words): Advocate for the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS). Emphasize Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures (TCBMs) and India’s role as a 'Responsible Spacefaring Nation.'
  • Conclusion (20-30 words): Reiterate space as Res Communis (common heritage of mankind); emphasize that technological advancement must be matched by diplomatic maturity.

3. Comprehensive Model Answer

The transition toward 'on-orbit space control weapons'—satellites capable of maneuvering close to others to disable or damage them—represents a paradigm shift in space warfare. While the Outer Space Treaty (OST) of 1967 established space as a domain for peaceful purposes, the lack of explicit prohibition on conventional, non-nuclear weaponization has rendered the current global governance architecture increasingly fragile.

Threats to Strategic Stability:
The deployment of these weapons creates a 'use-it-or-lose-it' instability. Unlike ground-based warfare, an attack in space risks triggering the Kessler Syndrome—a cascading debris effect that could render critical orbits (LEO/GEO) unusable for generations. Such weapons threaten the backbone of the modern digital economy, including GPS, banking, and military command-and-control systems, effectively turning the orbital commons into a high-stakes geopolitical theater.

Critical Limitations of Legal Frameworks:
Existing international law is largely inadequate for the current technological reality:
1. The Dual-Use Dilemma: The OST prohibits nuclear and WMDs but is silent on conventional 'dual-use' technologies (e.g., satellite servicing tech that doubles as a kinetic weapon).
2. Verification Deficit: There are no robust, legally binding verification mechanisms to distinguish between a defensive maneuver and an offensive act.
3. Geopolitical Deadlock: Major powers (US, Russia, China) prioritize military dominance, often blocking initiatives like the PAROS (Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space) treaty at the UN, citing national security concerns.

Way Forward:
To ensure the long-term sustainability of space, the international community must move beyond non-binding guidelines. A multi-pronged approach is required:

  • Normative Frameworks: Prioritize the adoption of Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures (TCBMs), such as mandatory notification of close-approach maneuvers.
  • Legal Evolution: Negotiate a supplementary protocol to the OST that explicitly defines and bans 'hostile acts' against space objects, regardless of the technology used.
  • Indian Leadership: As a responsible space power, India should leverage its 'Project NETRA' (Network for Space Object Tracking and Analysis) to advocate for global space traffic management rules.

Conclusion:
Outer space is Res Communis—a common heritage of mankind. If the militarization of orbits continues unchecked, we risk losing the very infrastructure that sustains global connectivity. Moving from strategic competition to a rules-based, sustainable space order is not just a diplomatic necessity, but a civilizational imperative.

4. Value Addition Box (Schemes, Data & Committees)

Concept/Framework Relevance for Answer
Kessler Syndrome Scientific rationale for preventing debris-creating ASAT tests.
Outer Space Treaty (1967) The 'Constitution' of outer space; prohibits WMDs in orbit.
PAROS UN initiative for Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space.
Project NETRA India's initiative for debris tracking; example of 'Responsible Spacefaring'.

ЁЯПЫ️ Official Government & Policy Updates (PIB Gazette Connect)

Key national initiatives, Cabinet & Ministry releases aligned with GS-2 and GS-3:

Comments

Post a Comment