UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 19, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 19, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

Daily UPSC Mains Answer Writing: Question & Model Answer Framework (October 19, 2026)

Today's Mains Question (GS Paper 2 & 3 - 15 Marks / 250 Words)

"The deployment of on-orbit space control weapons threatens global strategic stability and outer space as a global commons. In light of emerging geopolitical frictions, examine the challenges to multilateral space governance and discuss India's strategic imperatives in ensuring secure, sustainable, and peaceful space exploration."

1. Decoding the Directive & Demand of the Question

Directive: Examine and Discuss — The prompt requires a two-pronged analytical approach. First, critically investigate the operational threats posed by on-orbit space control weapons and the systemic flaws in current global governance frameworks. Second, deliberate upon India's strategic roadmap, balancing national security imperatives in the militarized cosmos with its traditional commitment to peaceful uses of outer space.

Core Demands of the Question:

  • Part 1: The nature of on-orbit space control weapons and their destabilizing impact on strategic stability and the "global commons" concept.
  • Part 2: Institutional loopholes and geopolitical gridlocks plaguing existing international space laws and multilateral forums.
  • Part 3: India's proactive diplomatic, technological, and defense imperatives (linking domestic capabilities with multilateral norm-building).

2. Structural Outline / Skeleton Framework

  • Introduction (30-40 words): Define outer space as a res extra commercium (beyond sovereign appropriation) and introduce the paradigm shift from peaceful militarization (reconnaissance, communication) to aggressive weaponization (on-orbit kinetic and non-kinetic intercepters).
  • Body Section 1: Threat Landscape & Strategic Instability (80-90 words):
    • Proliferation of co-orbital anti-satellite (ASAT) systems, directed-energy weapons, and proximity operations.
    • Exacerbation of the Kessler Syndrome risk due to orbital debris generation.
    • Erosion of strategic deterrence and the transition of terrestrial geopolitical rivalries into orbital theater.
  • Body Section 2: Bottlenecks in Multilateral Space Governance (80-90 words):
    • Archaic nature of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (OST)—bans weapons of mass destruction in orbit but leaves a regulatory vacuum for conventional/cyber space weapons.
    • Deadlock at the UN Conference on Disarmament (CD) regarding the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS).
    • Rise of plurilateralism and bilateral code-of-conduct fragmentation over binding international treaties.
  • Way Forward & India’s Strategic Imperatives (40-50 words):
    • Operationalizing domestic capabilities (Defence Space Agency, Mission Shakti learnings) while championing transparency and confidence-building measures (TCBMs).
    • Active leadership in UNCOPUOS and shaping normative frameworks for responsible behavior in space.
  • Conclusion (20-30 words): Reiterate that outer space must remain an engine for sustainable human progress rather than an arena of perpetual conflict, requiring collective global stewardship.

3. Comprehensive Model Answer

Introduction

Outer space, historically regarded as a res extra commercium and a shared global commons, is undergoing a dangerous transition. The recent deployment and testing of on-orbit space control weapons—ranging from co-orbital interceptors to electronic jamming systems—threaten to extend terrestrial geopolitical conflicts into low-Earth orbit (LEO), undermining global strategic stability.

Anatomy of Threats: On-Orbit Weaponization and Strategic Instability

The proliferation of space control technologies has fundamentally altered security calculus across major space-faring nations:

  • Co-Orbital & Proximity Operations: Satellites capable of maneuvering close to adversarial assets for inspection, disablement, or kinetic strikes blur the line between peaceful surveillance and active aggression.
  • Kessler Syndrome Multiplier: The potential use of kinetic weapons in orbit risks generating cascading fields of hyper-velocity space debris, rendering vital orbital slots unusable for scientific, commercial, and navigational payloads.
  • Asymmetric Deterrence: Unlike nuclear deterrence with its established doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), space weaponization creates ambiguities in attribution, inviting miscalculations during geopolitical flashpoints.

Institutional Gaps in Multilateral Space Governance

Current international architecture remains ill-equipped to handle modern space security challenges:

  • Regulatory Loopholes in the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (OST): Article IV prohibits placing nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction in orbit, but it contains glaring omissions regarding conventional weapons, cyber-attacks on ground stations, and directed-energy weapons.
  • Diplomatic Gridlock: Efforts at the UN Conference on Disarmament (CD) to draft a treaty on the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS) remain deadlocked due to conflicting national interests and strategic vetoes.
  • Normative Fragmentation: The shift from universally binding treaties to voluntary "norms of responsible behavior" risks creating toothless guidelines that compliance-deficit states easily bypass.

India’s Strategic Imperatives

As a responsible space superpower with advanced indigenous capabilities (exemplified by Mission Shakti and growing commercial prowess), India must navigate this volatile ecosystem through a dual-track strategy:

  1. Deterrent Preparedness: Strengthening domestic defensive architectures through the Defence Space Agency (DSA) and integrated command structures to protect critical national assets against on-orbit threats.
  2. Normative Multilateralism: Actively championing legally binding instruments at the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UNCOPUOS) and advocating for rigorous Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures (TCBMs).
  3. Commercial and Scientific Diplomacy: Promoting open access, joint technological ventures, and adherence to the Artemis Accords and UN guidelines to ensure sustainable exploration free from monopolistic militarization.

Conclusion

The weaponization of the cosmos represents a systemic threat to planetary security. For humanity to secure its sustainable future, global powers must move beyond zero-sum competition and forge robust multilateral regimes that preserve outer space as an uncompromised zone of peace, science, and shared prosperity.

4. Value Addition Box (Schemes, Data & Committees)

Category Key Instruments / Frameworks UPSC Relevance & Utility
International Treaties Outer Space Treaty (1967), Liability Convention (1972), Registration Convention (1975) Foundational legal basis for answering questions on space law and sovereignty.
Global Forums UNCOPUOS, UN Conference on Disarmament (PAROS framework) Crucial for quoting institutional mechanisms in GS Paper 2 (International Relations).
Indian Initiatives Mission Shakti (ASAT test, 2019), Defence Space Agency (DSA), Indian Space Policy 2023 Essential examples to substantiate India’s dual capability of strategic deterrence and commercial openness (GS Paper 3).
Key Concepts Res Extra Commercium, Kessler Syndrome, TCBMs (Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures) High-scoring terminology for analytical depth in Mains essays and answers.

ЁЯПЫ️ Official Government & Policy Updates (PIB Gazette Connect)

Key national initiatives, Cabinet & Ministry releases aligned with GS-2 and GS-3:

Comments

Post a Comment