UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 06, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

Daily UPSC Mains Answer Writing: Question & Model Answer Framework (October 06, 2026)

Today's Mains Question (GS Paper 3 - Science & Technology / International Relations - 15 Marks / 250 Words)

"The militarization of outer space, characterized by the development and potential deployment of on-orbit space control weapons, threatens the delicate balance of global strategic stability. Critically analyze the implications of this trend and discuss the necessity of a robust multilateral governance framework to ensure the peaceful use of outer space."

1. Decoding the Directive & Demand of the Question

Directive: "Critically Analyze" – This requires you to examine the issue from multiple perspectives (strategic, legal, environmental), weigh the pros and cons of current technological trends, and provide a balanced judgment on the necessity of governance.

Demand:
1. Implications: Discuss how space weapons disrupt strategic stability (deterrence, debris, surveillance).
2. Governance Necessity: Discuss why current frameworks are insufficient and what a new regime should look like.
3. Conclusion: A forward-looking stance on space as a global common.

2. Structural Outline / Skeleton Framework

Introduction (30-40 words): Define the evolving nature of space from a sanctuary to a warfighting domain. Reference the Outer Space Treaty (1967) as the foundational (but aging) bedrock.
Body Section 1 (80-90 words): Implications of 'on-orbit space control weapons' (e.g., co-orbital anti-satellite systems). Discuss the Kessler Syndrome (space debris), strategic instability, and the erosion of trust between major powers.
Body Section 2 (80-90 words): Challenges in Governance. Discuss the ambiguity of "dual-use" technologies, the lack of a clear legal definition of a "space weapon," and the limitations of the current UN COPUOS framework in enforcing compliance.
Way Forward & Recommendation (40-50 words): Advocate for PAROS (Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space), transparency and confidence-building measures (TCBMs), and the need for a legally binding international treaty.
Conclusion (20-30 words): Reiterate that space security is indivisible from earth security. Emphasize "Space Diplomacy" as the only viable path forward.

3. Comprehensive Model Answer

Outer space, once considered a pristine sanctuary for scientific exploration, is increasingly being perceived as a "warfighting domain." With the emergence of on-orbit space control weapons—technologies capable of maneuvering in proximity to satellites to disable or destroy them—the existing international order is under unprecedented strain.

Implications of the Militarization Trend

The deployment of offensive space capabilities creates a "security dilemma" where defensive measures are perceived as offensive, triggering an arms race. The primary implications include:

Strategic Instability: Space-based assets are the backbone of modern military command, control, and intelligence. Attacking these creates a "first-mover advantage," potentially lowering the threshold for nuclear conflict.
Kessler Syndrome: Kinetic anti-satellite tests create massive amounts of orbital debris. This threatens the long-term sustainability of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), endangering critical infrastructure like GPS, communication networks, and weather monitoring systems.
Erosion of Trust: The lack of transparency regarding "dual-use" technologies—satellites capable of both maintenance and sabotage—makes it impossible to distinguish between peaceful and hostile intent.

The Governance Gap

Current governance, primarily the Outer Space Treaty (OST) of 1967, is ill-equipped for modern realities. It prohibits the placement of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in orbit but remains silent on conventional space-control weapons. The challenges include:

Lack of Definition: There is no globally accepted legal definition of a "space weapon," allowing states to exploit loopholes.
Verification Difficulties: Unlike nuclear disarmament, verifying the non-existence of space weapons is technically complex, as almost any satellite can be repurposed as a kinetic weapon.

Way Forward

To navigate this, the international community must move beyond voluntary norms. There is an urgent need for:

PAROS (Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space): Revitalizing negotiations at the UN Conference on Disarmament to create a legally binding treaty.
Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures (TCBMs): Establishing "rules of the road" for orbital operations, including mandatory notification of maneuvers and communication channels between space-faring nations to avoid miscalculation.
Space Traffic Management (STM): Adopting universal standards for orbital debris mitigation and safe proximity operations.

Conclusion: Space is a global common, not a theater for geopolitical dominance. As humanity becomes increasingly dependent on orbital infrastructure, the international community must transition from a competitive "space race" to a collaborative "space governance" regime to ensure the final frontier remains a domain of progress rather than conflict.

4. Value Addition Box (Schemes, Data & Committees)

Concept/Tool	Relevance for Answer
Outer Space Treaty (1967)	Article IV prohibits WMDs in space; the "Constitution of Space."
Kessler Syndrome	A scenario where the density of objects in LEO is high enough that collisions between objects cause a cascade.
PAROS	Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space; a long-standing UN agenda item.
Dual-Use Technology	Hardware that can be used for both civilian/commercial and military/offensive purposes.

🏛️ Official Government & Policy Updates (PIB Gazette Connect)

Key national initiatives, Cabinet & Ministry releases aligned with GS-2 and GS-3:

DAILY NEWS TELLER

Search This Blog