UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 03, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 03, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

Daily UPSC Mains Answer Writing: Question & Model Answer Framework (October 03, 2026)

Today's Mains Question (GS Paper 2 - International Relations - 15 Marks / 250 Words)

"India’s balancing act between the expanded BRICS+ and its aspiration for a permanent UNSC seat reveals a nuanced 'multi-alignment' strategy. Critically evaluate the challenges and opportunities this approach presents for India’s leadership in the Global South."

1. Decoding the Directive & Demand of the Question

The directive is "Critically Evaluate." You are not merely required to list the benefits of BRICS or the UNSC; you must weigh the pros and cons of India’s current diplomatic posture. The examiner expects an analytical assessment of how India manages the inherent contradictions between these platforms.

  • Part 1: Identify the "Multi-alignment" strategy (Contextualizing India's role in BRICS+ vs. Western-aligned institutions).
  • Part 2: Analyze the opportunities (Synergies in Global South advocacy, UNSC reform push).
  • Part 3: Analyze the challenges (Geopolitical friction, China’s influence in BRICS, democratic legitimacy concerns).

2. Structural Outline / Skeleton Framework

  • Introduction (30-40 words): Link India’s foreign policy to Article 51 (Directive Principles of State Policy), emphasizing international peace, security, and just relations between nations. Define the current geopolitical context (BRICS expansion).
  • Body Section 1 (80-90 words): The Opportunities. Discuss how BRICS acts as a pressure group for UNSC reform, the focus on 'Global South' priorities (climate finance, digital infrastructure), and India as a 'Bridge-builder'.
  • Body Section 2 (80-90 words): The Challenges. Highlight the 'China factor' within BRICS, the risk of anti-Western perceptions, and the difficulty of balancing normative democratic values with authoritarian regimes.
  • Way Forward & Recommendation (40-50 words): Suggest 'Issue-based alignment' rather than 'Bloc-based alignment'. Mention the 'Vishwamitra' (Friend to the World) approach.
  • Conclusion (20-30 words): Conclude with a forward-looking statement on Strategic Autonomy 2.0.

3. Comprehensive Model Answer

India’s foreign policy is anchored in Article 51, which mandates the promotion of international peace and security. In the current multipolar era, India has adopted a strategy of 'multi-alignment'—engaging with the expanded BRICS+ for developmental cooperation while simultaneously lobbying for a permanent seat at the UNSC to ensure a rules-based global order.

Opportunities: The 'Bridge-Builder' Role

BRICS+ serves as a vital platform for the Global South, offering opportunities for India to amplify its voice on issues like Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR-RC) in climate governance. By leveraging BRICS, India creates a consensus-building mechanism that pressures the P5 members of the UNSC to accelerate reforms. Practically, this allows India to champion reformist agendas—such as reforming the IMF and World Bank—thereby positioning itself as the 'Voice of the Global South'.

Challenges: The Dilemma of Strategic Autonomy

However, this strategy faces structural bottlenecks. Firstly, the expansion of BRICS is increasingly viewed by the West as a counter-bloc, potentially alienating India’s strategic partners in the Quad. Secondly, China’s dominance within BRICS creates a 'hegemonic friction', where India’s interests often clash with Beijing’s desire to challenge the Western-led liberal order. Furthermore, balancing India’s democratic credentials with the authoritarian governance models prevalent in some BRICS+ nations risks creating an ethical dichotomy in its foreign policy, complicating its UNSC bid which relies on its image as the 'world's largest democracy'.

Way Forward

India must shift from a passive member to an active agenda-setter. It should advocate for 'Issue-Based Multilateralism', where partnerships are defined by specific interests (e.g., green transition, digital public infrastructure) rather than ideological blocs. Adopting the 'Vishwamitra' approach, India should leverage its unique position to act as a bridge between the G7 and the Global South, ensuring that its UNSC candidacy is seen as a stabilizing force rather than a disruptive one.

Conclusion

India’s multi-alignment is not a sign of indecision but a pragmatic evolution of Strategic Autonomy 2.0. By successfully navigating the BRICS-UNSC duality, India can effectively transform the global governance architecture to better reflect the realities of the 21st century.

4. Value Addition Box (Schemes, Data & Committees)

Component Key Reference/Data
Constitutional Basis Article 51 (Promotion of International Peace)
Key Concept 'Vishwamitra' (Friend to the World) Diplomacy
Global Framework G4 Nations (India, Brazil, Germany, Japan) for UNSC reform
Relevant Theory Liberal Institutionalism vs. Structural Realism

ЁЯПЫ️ Official Government & Policy Updates (PIB Gazette Connect)

Key national initiatives, Cabinet & Ministry releases aligned with GS-2 and GS-3:

Comments

Post a Comment