UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 04, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

UPSC Mains Daily Answer Writing Practice (October 04, 2026): Model Answer & Framework

Daily UPSC Mains Answer Writing: Question & Model Answer Framework (October 04, 2026)

Today's Mains Question (GS Paper 3 - 15 Marks / 250 Words)

"The rapid proliferation of 'on-orbit space control weapons' threatens to transform outer space from a domain of scientific exploration into a theater of geopolitical brinkmanship. In this context, critically analyze the implications of such militarization and discuss the necessity for a revamped multilateral governance framework to ensure space remains a sustainable global common."

1. Decoding the Directive & Demand of the Question

Directive: Critically Analyze. This requires a balanced evaluation of the risks associated with space militarization, the loopholes in existing international law, and a constructive path forward.

Core Demands:

  • Implications: Discuss how space weapons impact strategic stability, critical infrastructure, and long-term sustainability (e.g., debris).
  • Governance Gap: Explain why current treaties are insufficient to handle "on-orbit" capabilities (dual-use technology).
  • Way Forward: Propose actionable solutions for multilateral regulation.

2. Structural Outline / Skeleton Framework

  • Introduction (30-40 words): Define outer space as a "Global Common" under the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. Briefly mention the shift from peaceful exploration to the "securitization" of space.
  • Body Section 1: Implications (80-90 words):
    • Strategic Instability: The security dilemma and risk of escalation.
    • Critical Infrastructure: Vulnerability of GPS, banking, and military communication satellites.
    • Environmental Impact: The Kessler Syndrome (orbital debris chain reaction).
  • Body Section 2: Governance Challenges (80-90 words):
    • Limitations of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (focus on WMDs, not conventional/kinetic weapons).
    • The "Dual-Use" Dilemma: Difficulty in distinguishing between civilian maintenance satellites and offensive capabilities.
    • Lack of verification and transparency mechanisms.
  • Way Forward & Recommendation (40-50 words):
    • Reviving the PAROS (Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space) treaty.
    • Implementing "Space Situational Awareness" (SSA) sharing.
    • Norm-based approaches over legally binding treaties in the short term.
  • Conclusion (20-30 words): Emphasize space as a "Common Heritage of Mankind" and the urgency for a rules-based order to prevent planetary-level risks.

3. Comprehensive Model Answer

Outer space, once considered a pristine frontier for scientific discovery, is increasingly becoming a contested domain. The deployment of 'on-orbit space control weapons'—technologies capable of maneuvering near and disabling other satellites—poses a fundamental challenge to the established international order governed by the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (OST).

Implications of Orbital Militarization

The militarization of space introduces severe risks to global stability:

  • Strategic Instability: Unlike terrestrial domains, a conflict in space is opaque. The inability to distinguish between a malfunction and an attack creates a "use-it-or-lose-it" pressure, potentially triggering rapid escalation.
  • Critical Infrastructure Vulnerability: Modern economies rely on space-based assets for navigation, banking, and communications. Disabling these assets can paralyze civilian infrastructure.
  • The Kessler Syndrome: Anti-satellite (ASAT) tests or kinetic warfare create massive debris fields. This leads to a cascading collision effect, rendering crucial orbits unusable for future generations—an existential threat to the space economy.

Governance and the 'Dual-Use' Conundrum

The current legal architecture is ill-equipped for modern realities:

  • Regulatory Vacuum: The OST prohibits the placement of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in orbit but remains silent on conventional kinetic weapons, laser dazzlers, and cyber-attack capabilities.
  • The Dual-Use Problem: Satellites designed for "in-orbit servicing" or debris removal can easily be repurposed for offensive counter-space missions. This ambiguity makes verification and arms control agreements notoriously difficult to negotiate.

Way Forward

To preserve space as a global common, the international community must transition from mere rhetoric to actionable governance:

  • Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures (TCBMs): Establishing protocols for "safe approach" distances for satellites to avoid misinterpretation.
  • Strengthening PAROS: Reinvigorating UN discussions on the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space.
  • Normative Frameworks: Encouraging states to pledge a moratorium on destructive ASAT testing, similar to the US-led initiative, to curb immediate debris generation.

Conclusion: Space is the final frontier for humanity's collective progress. Without a robust, binding multilateral framework, we risk turning our orbital environment into a graveyard of debris and a trigger for terrestrial conflict. Preserving space as a "Common Heritage of Mankind" is not merely a diplomatic choice but a security imperative.

4. Value Addition Box (Schemes, Data & Committees)

Concept/Tool Relevance for Answer
Kessler Syndrome The phenomenon where the density of objects in LEO is high enough that collisions cause a cascade of space debris.
PAROS Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (UN proposed treaty).
Dual-Use Technology Technologies that can be used for both peaceful (e.g., debris removal) and military purposes (e.g., satellite capture).
UNCOPUOS United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (The primary deliberative body).

ЁЯПЫ️ Official Government & Policy Updates (PIB Gazette Connect)

Key national initiatives, Cabinet & Ministry releases aligned with GS-2 and GS-3:

Comments

Post a Comment